The chattering class at Davos hailed the substance and clarity of Carney’s stand. “We know that it reflects a change in the global order that we’ve almost all seen coming increasingly over the past years, but no major government leader was prepared to actually say it,” Ian Bremmer, president of the Eurasia Group, a geopolitical risk consultancy, told me, adding that “people are going to be thinking back on [the speech] for quite a long time.” “It was the only one of the leader speeches that I saw that, with weight and moral earnestness, expressed the shock which many of us are feeling here,” said Adam Tooze, an economic historian and popular podcaster who moderated a difficult conversation with Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick. Wolfgang Ischinger, a former German diplomat and doyen of European foreign policy, concurred. He described Carney’s remarks as “absolutely admirable,” and said that “there are some people who are now saying, ‘why can’t we invite Canada to be a member of the E.U.?’” Carney, a suave former central banker, was in some ways built to star in Davos. “He gave a brilliant speech, a memorable speech, and I also think it’s a speech that someone like Donald Trump respects,” Anthony Scaramucci, a Davos regular who was briefly Trump’s White House communications director, told me. “And my recommendation to European leaders is call Mark — he’s available for executive leadership coaching.” Trump seemed to have been briefed on Carney’s speech and its enthusiastic reception. “Canada lives because of the United States — remember that, Mark, the next time you make your statements,” he said somewhat darkly from the Davos podium Wednesday. And on Thursday, in a social media post addressed to Carney, Trump added that he was rescinding Canada’s invitation to the Board of Peace. The sense of “rupture” highlighted by Carney was shared by many others in Davos. “The one thing that has come up in many sessions I’ve been at is that we are in a new reality,” said Cornell University economist Eswar Prasad. “It’s not a cycle that is going to go back to some degree of normalcy.” But what it augurs for international cooperation and WEF-themed crises like climate change and social inequality is more uncertain. “One reason Mark Carney’s speech was important was that it reclaimed agency for countries who want to address these challenges on the basis of shared principles,” David Miliband, president and CEO of the International Rescue Committee, a humanitarian organization, told me. “The geopolitics of the moment are not just about the power of the titans. The rise of the middle powers and their collective heft is a potential route forward for issues that will bite if they are not addressed.” Comfort Ero, head of the International Crisis Group, a think tank, lamented that it took a threat to the sovereignty of a European country for a major Western leader to call out “what was at stake and what the rest of the world had been going through — to recognize the unevenness, the illusion, the sense that the rules-based order was there in terms of the framework,” she said, but not in real practice. “We’re watching history unfolding, but we can choose whether we want it to become a race to the bottom, or whether we’re going to prioritize protecting what we’ve built over the last few decades, which is the multilateral trading system,” Jumoke Oduwole, Nigeria’s minister for industry, trade and investment, told me. She said Carney’s speech made her feel hopeful. “This is one of the Davoses that has made me feel like everybody’s looking at the world and how we can come together,” she said. “Everybody’s looking at each other with fresh eyes.” |